Problems experienced within the utilization of the literature review and methods to solve them

In this specific article, postgraduate students can find out about the difficulties encountered into the implementation of the literary works review and how to solve them.

Not enough literature on the subject

Whenever searching both domestic and literature that is foreign focus on the search words utilized by you: issues with the seek out literary works may be caused by the employment of wrong terms.

For several clinical areas, domestic experts have inked not as research than foreign ones. Consequently, when you yourself have maybe not found domestic literature about them, maybe you are able to discover foreign literature. To start with, you really need to count on the Medline database.

In the event that you still can maybe not find literature on the topic, you ought to adjust the master plan for the defense according to genuine possibilities. In addition, the present situation ought to be reported into the systematic frontrunner on time. In clinical works, as an example, you can upload materials on epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, hospital, diagnosis and therapy types of the studied condition, along with historic guide.

In the event that review is dedicated to the scholarly research of this effectiveness associated with procedure, one could describe:

  • its history,
  • apparatus of action,
  • its application as well as its effectiveness in several fields of medicine;
  • description of alternative treatments with a focus on their insufficient effectiveness, complexity of application, negative effects, etc.

So that you can avoid this situation, it is strongly recommended that during the phase of assortment of literary works, select help with homework™ all materials which may be of good use.

Insufficient number of the review

There are many approaches to raise the scope associated with survey:

  • change the wording by entering phrases that are additional sentences. Small escalation in amount.
  • include extra things – the essential radical method. You can include maybe not containing information that is important but big by amount of data – a historic reference, the etiology of this condition. Often information that is such not carrying a semantic load, is just a description associated with pathogenesis for the disease.
  • if the references are presented by means of figures – exchange them by “last name + year”, while including several names to the mention of one supply. Enables you to raise the volume to 5 pages.

Insufficient wide range of types of literary works

Most often there is a inadequate number of contemporary sources. This dilemma is solved without difficulty – by looking the literary works when you look at the electronic catalogs of this CB in addition to PubMed database.

The full total number of sources may be increased because of the introduction of paragraphs, containing many links and additional back ground information, as an example:

Many studies of domestic (…) and international (…) researchers have now been devoted to the scholarly study of this issues of remedy for disease X.

Presence of old sources into the review can also be a negative characteristic. The search into the PubMed database enables not just to find interesting information about the subject, but in addition represents the way that is simplest to resolve the difficulty for the lack of recommendations in the past few years.